purpose operating systems

20 examples (0.04 sec)
  • Traditional multi-purpose operating systems are designed to support a wide range of usage models and requirements.
  • Some secure cryptoprocessors can even run general-purpose operating systems such as Linux inside their security boundary.
  • Operating systems for wireless sensor network nodes are typically less complex than general-purpose operating systems.
  • None of these ultra-high assurance secure general purpose operating systems have been produced for decades or certified under Common Criteria.
  • Most modern bus architectures, such as PCI, allow multiple devices to bus master because it significantly improves performance for general purpose operating systems.
  • Several mainstream, general-purpose operating systems implement ASLR.
  • Even the most basic processors these days have sufficient storage to allow the operating system overhead, and if this is still a problem, basic general purpose operating systems are available for that purpose.
  • Based on this and other assumptions, which may not be realistic for the common use of general-purpose operating systems, the claimed security functions of the Windows products are evaluated.
  • General-purpose operating systems usually do not allow user programs to mask (disable) interrupts, because the user program could control the CPU for as long as it wishes.
  • Paging is an important part of virtual memory implementation in most contemporary general-purpose operating systems, allowing them to use secondary storage for data that does not fit into physical random-access memory (RAM).
  • Probably the single greatest reason for Novell's success during the '80s and '90s was the efficiency of NetWare compared to general purpose operating systems.
  • For this purpose operating systems or DNS server or resolver software packages typically include a file with all addresses of the DNS root servers.
  • Thus as general purpose operating systems became stable, supercomputers began to borrow and adapt the critical system code from them and relied on the rich set of secondary functionality that came with them, not having to reinvent the wheel.
  • By comparison, general-purpose operating systems such as Unix or Microsoft Windows were based on an interactive, time-sharing model where competing programs would consume all available resources if not held in check by the operating system.
  • When the shared resource must be reserved without blocking all other tasks (such as waiting for Flash memory to be written), it is better to use mechanisms also available on general-purpose operating systems, such as semaphores and OS-supervised interprocess messaging.
  • However, in practice, third party drives are usually available to give support for the most widely used file systems in most general-purpose operating systems (for example, NTFS is available in Linux through NTFS-3g, and ext2/3 and ReiserFS are available in Windows through third-party software).
  • Nevertheless, since Linux distributions and FreeBSD are still general-purpose operating systems, with other applications competing for VM resources, KVM and bhyve can also be categorized as type-2 hypervisors.
  • The main differences of an EABI with respect to an ABI for general purpose operating systems are that privileged instructions are allowed in application code, dynamic linking is not required (sometimes it is completely disallowed), and a more compact stack frame organization is used to save memory.
  • Measurements made by the different RTP-MIDI actors give latency times from a few hundreds of microseconds for embedded systems using real-time operating systems, up to 3 milliseconds when computers running general purpose operating systems (Windows, Mac OS, Linux) are involved.
  • Some specific-purpose operating systems (such as FreeNAS, NAS4Free, Openfiler, OpenMediaVault, or based on OpenSolaris and derivatives like napp-it, NexentaStor, OmniOS and OpenIndiana) implement iSCSI target support.

How purpose operating systems gets used